I'm pleased to make available the Blog below, which has resulted from that request and which I hope will be read carefully alongside the details I published. May I thank Rob Stoneman for his contribution, Jan Crowther for her initial comments and anyone who, as a result of these entries, adds their own comments to the debate.
GUEST BLOG - DR. ROB STONEMAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, YWT.
From the Chief Executive of Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, can I
thank John for his interesting blog. We do understand some of the opposition to
a new visitor centre at Spurn. We share
a gut instinct that Spurn should be a wild place, subject to the forces of
nature and better for it. Yet Spurn,
like most other parts of Britain, has a landscape that has been framed and
created by an interplay of those natural forces and by humans. In 1959, when YWT bought the site from the
MOD, Spurn was a military complex. Over
the years, YWT has attempted to ‘re-wild’ the site (to use modern parlance) by
removing buildings to leave only those that are required by our tenants –
currently the Bird Observatory, Associated British Ports and RNLI. We resisted taking the lighthouse from
Trinity House in 1985 knowing that eventually we would have to restore it given
its listed building status, even going to court over it, but were forced to
take on the lighthouse when it ceased operation.
The spit itself was locked into position by the wartime
defences since at the least the First World War, and probably even earlier, so
was always likely to dramatically readjust; the storm surge breach was probably
inevitable.
So, from 1959, it was YWT that took on the role of as the
human shaper of Spurn and our tenure has been much less dramatic and more
gentle, generally working with the grain rather than against the grain of
nature. Nevertheless, Spurn is a popular
tourist destination receiving over 70,000 years at its visitor peak in the
1980s with people attracted by that wild landscape, by its birds and other
wildlife, for fishing, for walking, for military history or simply as a day out
to the beach. Even today, with the spit
no longer accessible by car, Spurn receives over 20,000 visitors, which if
unmanaged will have an unintentional consequence on what is a fragile and
delicate site – whether that be by trampling dune habitat, bird disturbance,
fires, litter and so on.
For decades our approach to visitor management has been
rather blunt – we put a man at the entrance to the site who essentially policed
access and in so doing more or less policed the use of the site. A blunt instrument for sure but it has more
or less worked. However, for most of
those decades, YWT was a very small institution that never had the money to pay
the salary let alone invest in effective visitor infrastructure. Instead, we charged an entrance fee. The income never quite covered the costs of
running Spurn but it was enough to keep the site open. Was this a popular approach? Well, of course not. Charging people to access a piece of open
countryside by a man who often had to say ‘No’ (to dogs, to overnight camping,
to off-roaders, to bait diggers etc.) is not a popular strategy but what else
could YWT do?
Actually, YWT should have invested in better visitor
infrastructure and recognised that with a report by Ian Carstairs as far back
as 1996. It was only in 2010, that YWT
started to properly consider what it might need at Spurn and how it should run
the site into the future with the first ‘business plans’ (wish-lists might be a
better word) that were put together by myself.
We applied to the Heritage Lottery Fund to put some of that plan in
place but were rejected twice. But
eventually, in 2012, we finally received news that our lottery application was
making headway. We could finally start
with plans to restore the lighthouse, put in a viewing platform at the Point
and appoint a Heritage Officer to run an events and education programme.
But this only addressed part of the issue – we still didn’t
have the right visitor facilities in place - and then the storm surge struck.
Of course, losing vehicle access was always a risk in such a
vulnerable location and we had a contingency plan in place (essentially
switching to walk-on and bike-on access) but operating the site with 4WD
vehicles across the breach. Natural
England provided funding for those 4WD vehicles not only allowing us, as
managers, vehicle and therefore effective management access to the site, but
also providing a further visitor access option – our Spurn Safaris that use the
Unimog. This was hugely appreciated but
other problems have arisen. In
particular, visitors now concentrate at the Warren area. We have some car-parking at the Blue Bell but
most people drive as far as they can, parking at the Warren Cottage or down
along the road back to Kilnsea. At busy
times, its chaotic with cars parked all over and all the visitors now
congregating around the Warren Cottage area – it is a mess and no way to manage
a National Nature Reserve.
Parking congestion at Spurn. Jonathon Leadley, YWT.
The breach itself gives us H&S concerns. Despite, clear signage that is updated on a
weekly basis, we still get people stranded or, and much worse, attempt to cross
the breach even with water streaming across it at high tide. Add in our usual mix of H&S concerns –
browntail moths, dangerous structures and the dangers of walking on what is now
a pretty isolated site in inclement weather………..as Chief H&S officer at
YWT, it keeps me awake at night.
Moreover, we say little to people about the site – where to
go, what to do, what to see, how it formed, what its history, what are those
big concrete blocks for, why is there a railway heading off into the sea……there
is such a great story at Spurn, it is incumbent upon us – YWT – to tell people
about this brilliant site. More than
that, nature reserves should be the cathedrals of nature conservation – the
places to inspire, educate and involve people in our efforts for a better more
wildlife-rich Yorkshire and a better planet that sustains us long into the
future. Spurn is incredible and we want
lots of people to come to Spurn to join our campaign for wildlife. Spurn should be for the many and not the
privileged few.
For this, we need the right visitor infrastructure – a place
to get a hot drink and food; a place to go the toilet; a place to learn about
this fabulous site – its stories, its history, its wildlife; a place for
signposting, telling you where you can go and where you can go safely and
without damaging the special nature of the site – we needed a visitor centre
and a car-park to replace the current mess. We had long known that, even before
the storm surge, so had long been in discussions with EON about possible
funding after they received planning permission for a new wind farm off
Spurn. They didn’t have to give us any
money; they already had planning permission but recognised that they too had a
story to tell – a story of climate change, of its effects on the planet, not
least on the coast, of renewable energy and a brighter more sustainable
future. And so they offered YWT £900,000
to build a new visitor centre at Spurn.
We were delighted.
The investment that Spurn so badly needs finally fell into place. By working with partners, Kilnsea Wetlands
becomes the first port of call – with a hide and car-park providing just the
right birding facilities. From there, we
pass the Blue Bell – our plans include trainee accommodation. At the least sensitive location on Spurn in
terms of its wildlife, we will have the visitor centre and car-park; the
starting point for an informed, safe and enjoyable visit to Spurn. Crucially,
for us, the starting point for a managed visit to Spurn, following self-guided
or guided trails, by Unimog, by bike and on foot, that ensure visitors do not
damage the special interest of Spurn.
Moving down the Point, the Warren area will be re-naturalised leaving
just the cottage. From there to the lighthouse, it’s a wild journey over the
breach and along the spit. At the
lighthouse, the story of Spurn can be delved into deeper and the fabulous view
of Spurn stretches out from the top. At
the Point, vacated ABP buildings will have toilets and a tea-point to get out
of the weather with more information for visitors. A brilliant day out.
It’s a big prize and one that we are hugely excited by. The alternative is a managed decline and possibly
even site closure. That’s not a good
future for Spurn and one we are determined not to take.
No comments:
Post a Comment